![active sky 16 vs rex active sky 16 vs rex](https://pcflight.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ASCA_11.png)
![active sky 16 vs rex active sky 16 vs rex](https://store.flightsim.com/wp-content/uploads/HTC-115f-510x263.jpg)
I was given my clearance by Shanwick delivery and advised my cleared level would be F元70. Curiously though, according to the TMI-332 release, special restrictions mean that the track is Westbound only and operating at ODD levels, between DOGAL and ELSIR. Now- today we have one NAT track- ALPHA going Westbound in the real world, and this is being applied on VATSIM too. November 2020- an "unusual" year in aviation terms- we can agree I think?
#ACTIVE SKY 16 VS REX CODE#
It is entirely against Vatsim philosophy and the Code of Conduct. Anyone new to Vatsim hearing the above rant, could only be put off. If the pilot had a disagreement such as the above, he should NOT conduct any related discussion "over the airwaves" in public, but should, out of common courtesy, discuss the matter by private means: PM or e-mail, or such-like.ģ. Therefore the GND controller (no other controller at EGLL at the time) was perfectly within his rights to instruct the aircraft to hold.Ģ. As far as I am aware, authority of a GND controller covers all licensed aerodrome surfaces, except for the runways, by delegation. The pilot immediately criticised the GND controller publicly, saying that he had no authority to hold the aircraft at TITAN and would be filing a critical report. The reason, perhaps unknown to the pilot, was that another aircraft was ahead in the departure order, and would be crossing in front of him. This morning at EGLL (11.40z) a pilot was publicly quite rude and 'out of order' in comms with EGLL-5-GND.ĪTC asked an aircaft to hold at TITAN (for 27R departure) when the aircraft had aleady reached TITAN.